Semantics makes all the difference

The White House on Tuesday assailed Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton for criticizing President Bush in her latest television ad, calling her statements "outrageous." The 60-second spot, which began running Tuesday in Iowa, intercuts scenes of the candidate interacting with voters and talking about challenges facing many working people.
"If you're a family that is struggling and you don't have health care, you are invisible to this president. If you're a single mom trying to find affordable child care so you can go to work, you're invisible too. The ad also argued that U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are "invisible" to Bush.
White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino initially declined to comment on the ad, but then lambasted the spot and the senator
Happy to be in a debate with the White House, the Clinton campaign quickly linked to the official transcript of Perino's comments on its campaign Web site, www.hillarysucks.com ... (thinks she gets a free plug? Guess again)...with the headline, "White House Attacks Hillary's New Ad."
Campaigning in Dubuque, Iowa, Clinton referred to the White House criticism of her "invisible" comments.
"Apparently I've struck a nerve. The White House just attacked me a few minutes ago," Clinton said.


Funny how our fair and unbiased news media works, huh? She uses innuendo, lies and misleading statements and if the president or his people make any defense, they are "attacking" her. Keep an eye on the "fourth estate" folks. They want your vote for their preferred candidate and will say anything to sway your choice away from you.